New species of human ancestor named: Homo bodoensis

The Middle Pleistocene (now renamed Chibanian and dated to 774,000-129,000 years ago) is important because it saw the rise of our own species (Homo sapiens) in Africa, our closest relatives, and the Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis) in Europe.

However, human evolution during this age is poorly understood, a problem which paleoanthropologists call "the muddle in the middle." The announcement ofHomo bodoensishopes to bring some clarity to this puzzling, but important chapter in human evolution.

The new name is based on a reassessment of existing fossils from Africa and Eurasia from this time period. Traditionally, these fossils have been variably assigned to eitherHomo heidelbergensisorHomo rhodesiensis, both of which carried multiple, often contradictory definitions.

"Talking about human evolution during this time period became impossible due to the lack of proper terminology that acknowledges human geographic variation" according to Roksandic, lead author on the study.

Recently, DNA evidence has shown that some fossils in Europe calledH. heidelbergensiswere actually early Neanderthals, making the name redundant. For the same reason, the name needs to be abandoned when describing fossil humans from east Asia according to co-author, Xiu-Jie Wu (Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Beijing, China).

Further muddling the narrative, African fossils dated to this period have been called at times bothH. heidelbergensisandH. rhodesiensis.H. rhodesiensis定义得很糟糕,宽的名字从来没有ly accepted. This is partly due to its association with Cecil Rhodes and the horrendous crimes carried out during colonial rule in Africa -- an unacceptable honour in light of the important work being done toward decolonizing science.

The name "bodoensis" derives from a skull found in Bodo D'ar, Ethiopia, and the new species is understood to be a direct human ancestor. Under the new classification,H. bodoensiswill describe most Middle Pleistocene humans from Africa and some from Southeast Europe, while many from the latter continent will be reclassified as Neanderthals,

The co-first author Predrag Radovic (Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Serbia) says, "Terms need to be clear in science, to facilitate communication. They should not be treated as absolute when they contradict the fossil record."

The introduction ofH. bodoensisis aimed at "cutting the Gordian knot and allowing us to communicate clearly about this important period in human evolution," according to one of the co-authors Christopher Bae (Department of Anthropology, University of Hawai'i at Manoa).

Roksandic agrees: "Naming a new species is a big deal, as the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature allows name changes only under very strictly defined rules. We are confident that this one will stick around for a long time, a new taxon name will live only if other researchers use it."