New!Sign up for our freeemail newsletter.
Science News
from research organizations

Gains in one type of disruption force are offset by losses in another

Date:
December 2, 2019
Source:
DOE/Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
Summary:
Simulations show that halo currents can serve as a proxy for the total force produced by vertical disruptions.
Share:
FULL STORY

Doughnut-shaped tokamaks -- facilities designed to reproduce the fusion energy that powers the sun and stars on Earth -- must withstand forces that can be stronger than hurricanes created by disruptions in the plasma that fuels fusion reactions. Recent findings by physicists at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) show that certain forces released by disruptions act in a surprising manner. The results could enable designers of large future facilities such as ITER, the international tokamak under construction in France, to better contain forces that could seriously damage the facility.

Two forces

Causing these forces produced by disruptions called "vertical displacement events" (VDEs) are "eddy" currents that swirl within a tokamak's inner walls and "halo" currents that enter and exit the walls. Yet no matter how strong the halo currents grow, the total forces slamming into the walls do not become more powerful. Results of state-of-the-art PPPL simulations, using PPPL's flagship M3D-C1 code, show that any increase in the halo current is unexpectedly offset by a reduction in the eddy current -- just as losses offset gains in a bank account as if it were a zero-sum game.

"What we found was that changing the halo current doesn't affect the total vertical force," said Cesar Clauser, a PPPL post-graduate fellow who led the research reported inNuclear Fusion. "This was a surprising and interesting result."

Fusion combines light elements in the form of plasma, the hot, charged state of matter composed of free electrons and atomic nuclei. Physicists seek to capture and control fusion on Earth to produce a safe, clean and virtually limitless source of power for generating electricity.

PPPL researchers aimed to compare their sophisticated model with findings of the simplified models that ITER uses to calculate disruptive forces. "One implication to draw from our study is that measuring the halo current could be a proxy for the total forces," said PPPL physicist Nate Ferraro, a coauthor of the paper with PPPL physicist Stephen Jardin. "This could lead to a more complete understanding."

Advanced PPPL code

The advanced PPPL code M3D-C1 revealed the close relationship between the eddy and halo current forces in ITER plasmas and showed that changing the halo current did not affect the total vertical forces. "The simulations covered a wide range of halo current cases since we wanted to look for the worst-case scenario," Clauser said.

The two-dimensional simulations analyzed the total force produced by the two currents but not the distribution of forces within ITER walls. Future three-dimensional studies will model the distribution to seek out paths for halo currents that eddy currents might not offset.


Story Source:

Materialsprovided byDOE/Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory.注意:内容可能被编辑风格d length.


Journal Reference:

  1. C.F. Clauser, S.C. Jardin, N.M. Ferraro.Vertical forces during vertical displacement events in an ITER plasma and the role of halo currents.Nuclear Fusion, 2019; 59 (12): 126037 DOI:10.1088/1741-4326/ab440a

Cite This Page:

DOE/Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory. "Gains in one type of disruption force are offset by losses in another." ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 2 December 2019. /releases/2019/12/191202135713.htm>.
DOE/Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory. (2019, December 2). Gains in one type of disruption force are offset by losses in another.ScienceDaily. Retrieved December 26, 2023 from www.koonmotors.com/releases/2019/12/191202135713.htm
DOE/Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory. "Gains in one type of disruption force are offset by losses in another." ScienceDaily. www.koonmotors.com/releases/2019/12/191202135713.htm (accessed December 26, 2023).

Explore More
from ScienceDaily

RELATED STORIES